Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
KMJ-Kuwait Medical Journal. 2000; 32 (3): 237-249
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-54392

RESUMO

To review the current status of diagnosis and treatment of invasive Candida infections. In recent years, Candida species have emerged as the fourth most frequent cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections, thus acquiring similar clinical significance as other familiar bacterial pathogens commonly associated with hospital-acquired sepsis. Despite growing clinical importance of Candida, a large number of patients die due to undiagnosed invasive candidiasis. With the current limitations of laboratory diagnostic tests, an understanding of the clinical setting or the risk factors in which a Candida species assumes the role of a destructive pathogen is extremely crucial for suspecting an early diagnosis. The information provided in this article has been obtained through Medline search and is largely based on the recommendations made by various expert groups on the subject. The diagnosis of invasive candidiasis is problematic due to the following reasons: [i] blood cultures may remain negative in about 50% of the patients with proven candidiasis, [ii] candidemia, a marker of dissemination, does not necessarily establish a disseminated disease, [iii] ophthalmologic examination is a valuable tool in diagnosing disseminated candidiasis but retinal lesions are found in less than 30% of candidemia patients and [iv] serologic tests lack sensitivity and specificity To improve isolation of Candida species from blood, use of Isolator lysis centrifugation method is recommended. Likewise, specificity and sensitivity of antigen detection in serum specimens can be enhanced by frequent sampling. All patients, even with a single positive blood culture, need to be treated with systemic antifungal therapy Amphotericin B is the standard drug for the treatment of invasive and disseminated candidiasis, particularly in neutropenic patients. 5-flucytosine in combination with amphotericin B is recommended for the treatment of severe Candida infections specially those associated with endophthalmitis, endocarditis, suppurative thrombophlebitis and meningitis, and also if the infection is caused by C. lusitaniae or C. glabrata. Liposomal formulations of amphotericin B, despite their decreased nephrotoxicity, have not been found to enhance therapeutic efficacy in clinical conditions. They should be used restrictively only for patients who are intolerant of or refractory to conventional amphotericin B therapy Fluconazole [400mg/d] is an effective and safe alternative to amphotericin B [0.5 -0.6mg/kg] for treatment of invasive candidiasis. Since the drug has excellent cerebrospinal penetration and is excreted unchanged through the kidneys, it is especially useful for the treatment of meningeal and genitourinary Candida infections. Considering its high safety profile, fluconazole can be selectively administered in much higher doses [>/= 600mg/day]. Until more sensitive and specific laboratory tests become available, an integrated approach based on blood cultures, serodiagnostic tests, and careful repeated clinical evaluation of the patients for evidence of hematogenous dissemination, should form the basis for the diagnosis of invasive and disseminated candidiasis. Early recognition of the risk factors with a high index of suspicion remains an integral component of the diagnostic approach


Assuntos
Candidíase/tratamento farmacológico , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Anfotericina B , Fluconazol
2.
LMJ-Lebanese Medical Journal. 2000; 48 (4): 203-207
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-54467

RESUMO

Advances in molecular technology have helped in better understanding of mechanisms and diagnosis of diseases in many medical fields.Several molecular techniques are available for determining the genotypic drug-resistance and monitoring epidemic spread of a particular antimicrobial resistance gene in a hospital or patient population.The molecular [genotypic] testing has several advantages over conventional [phenotypic] testing in being faster and unambiguous, more accurate, able to detect masked resistance and can serve as a "gold" or "reference" test for detecting antibiotic resistance genes. This article addresses these molecular tests with their application and limitations and provide examples of their use especially in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus


Assuntos
Biologia Molecular , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efeitos dos fármacos , Antituberculosos/farmacologia , Resistência a Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos
4.
Medical Principles and Practice. 1993; 3 (3): 160-166
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-29375

RESUMO

A comparative statistical analysis was performed to detect various types of specimens and organisms used in the microbiology Quality Assessment Programme in Kuwait for 16 participant laboratories. A total of 139 samples were used during a period of 6 years. Organisms had more effect than specimens on the performance of the various laboratories. Samples prepared with one organism [fluids] obtained the highest mean scores, followed by mixtures prepared as wound swabs, stool, and material obtained from the respiratory and genital tracts. Organisms were sorted into five groups and the analysis gave high mean score performances in the following order: Entero-bacteriaceae, Micrococcaceae, other gram-positive organisms, other gram-negative bacteria and non-fermenters. The results of our experience will prove useful in improving the performance of various laboratories of Kuwait


Assuntos
Estudo de Avaliação , Controle de Qualidade , Análise de Regressão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA